The Historical Context

Before the advent of colonialism, hunting in Africa was not just a means to an end or a strategy for survival; it was an integral part of various African cultures, a rite of passage, and a way to establish community bonds. As we navigate through the discourse of trophy hunting, it is important to reconcile the deep-rooted, intrinsic connection between African communities and hunting with the evolving global perspectives and attitudes towards conservation and animal welfare.

Socio-economic Aspects

Today, trophy hunting is a multi-million-dollar industry, contributing significantly to the economies of several African nations. It creates jobs, fosters community development, and generates revenue for conservation financing (Lindsey et al., 2007). But like any other economic activity, it comes with its own set of challenges, including sustainability issues and ethical conundrums. Sustainability in this context transcends beyond ecological balance. It encompasses providing lasting economic opportunities for local communities, fostering social inclusion, and preserving the rich diversity that Africa harbours (Thomsen et al., 2022). For local communities who have lived in harmony with the wildlife for generations, trophy hunting offers both opportunities and dilemmas. They stand at the intersection where tradition meets modernity, where the necessity intersects with ethics.

A Wider Audience: Stakeholder Engagement

To forge a path forward, a comprehensive stakeholder engagement process is paramount. Policymakers, academics, international communities, investors, and local communities must come together for an ‘indaba’ to discuss, debate, and deliberate on the myriad dimensions of trophy hunting (Mitchell et al., 2021). As we navigate this complex discourse, it becomes imperative to engage with the wider audience. Each stakeholder would contribute a unique perspective to the discussion, and it is through collaborative dialogue that sustainable solutions can emerge beyond insults and polarity. Academics can provide research-based insights into the ecological impacts of trophy hunting and propose models for sustainable wildlife management (Dickman et al., 2019). Whereas policymakers can craft regulations that ensure the welfare of both the wildlife and the communities that depend on them. International communities and investors can offer support in terms of resources and expertise, aiding in the development of infrastructure and technologies that promote conservation (Clark et al., 2023). Meanwhile, the local communities, the custodians of African wildlife, can share their indigenous knowledge and wisdom, their experiences, and their aspirations, helping to shape policies that are both inclusive and equitable (van Houdt et al., 2021). It is high time that stakeholders concerned with trophy hunting cooperate and work together for the sake of sustainability.

Reimagining Trophy Hunting: A Call for Reform

Towards the latter part of this discourse, we find ourselves faced with difficult but essential questions. As we stand at the crossroads of tradition and modernity, we must ask ourselves: is it time to reimagine trophy hunting? How can we ensure that this practice evolves to become more ethical and inclusive? First and foremost, the industry needs to undergo substantial reforms that align it with the principles of sustainability and ethical treatment of animals. Governance system and regulations needs strengthening to be more rigorous, with robust monitoring mechanisms in place to prevent overexploitation and guarantee the welfare of the animals (Muposhi et al., 2016). Further, social inclusion should be at the heart of these reforms, empowering local communities to have a greater say in the management and conservation of wildlife resources (Ullah & Kim, 2020). These communities have a rich heritage of coexisting with wildlife, and their wisdom and insights can be a guiding light in shaping a more sustainable and ethical trophy hunting industry (Thomsen et al., 2022).

Next, we come to a deeply contentious issue – the very nomenclature of ‘trophy hunting’. In the current global context, where there is an increasing emphasis on conservation and animal welfare, the term ‘trophy hunting’ has garnered a negative connotation, often associated with the brutal killing of wildlife species for sport. Thus, it becomes pertinent to consider a change in terminology, one that resonates with the evolving perspectives on wildlife conservation and animal ethics.

Changing the name of trophy hunting to something like “sustainable safari off-takes” or “harvesting” could potentially alter perceptions, especially if it is paired with genuine efforts to make the practice more sustainable and conservation-focused. This could be more representative of an industry that aims to harmonize economic gains with ecological balance and social inclusion. In my next piece, I will have a deep dive into this aspect of nomenclature and the possible positive impact on perception as well as the negative impact or skepticism on the subject.

A Future Envisioned

In conclusion, the conversation around trophy hunting in Africa needs to evolve, considering the multi-faceted connections between humans and wildlife. By fostering a dialogue that encompasses various stakeholder perspectives, we can hope to carve a future where trophy hunting transforms into an activity that respects the sanctity of life, promotes community development, and fosters ecological balance for sustainability.

As we reflect on this inevitable transformational trajectory, let us hold close to our hearts the rich tapestry of African cultures, the majestic wildlife that graces its lands, and the vibrant communities that call it home. Together, we can forge a future where humans and wildlife coexist in harmony, where tradition meets modernity, and where Africa leads the way in showcasing a model of sustainable and ethical wildlife management to the world.

Victor K. Muposhi is an AWEI Fellow. He is affiliated with Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Africa Leadership University, and Chinhoyi University of Technology, Zimbabwe.

References

Clark, D. A., Brehony, P., Dickman, A., Foote, L., Hart, A. G., Jonga, C., Mbiza, M. M., Roe, D., & Sandbrook, C. (2023). Hunting trophy import bans proposed by the UK may be ineffective and inequitable as conservation policies in multiple social-ecological contexts. Conservation Letters, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12935

Dickman, A., Cooney, R., Johnson, P. J., Louis, M. P., & Roe, D. (2019). Trophy hunting bans imperil biodiversity. In Science (Vol. 365, Issue 6456). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz0735

Lindsey, P. A., Roulet, P. A., & Romañach, S. S. (2007). Economic and conservation significance of the trophy hunting industry in sub-Saharan Africa. In Biological Conservation (Vol. 134, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.005

Mitchell, C. D., Bleich, V. C., Bowyer, R. T., Heffelfinger, J. R., Stewart, K. M., & White, P. A. (2021). A Call for More Nuanced Dialogues About Trophy Hunting. Journal of Wildlife Management, 85(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22017

Muposhi, V. K., Gandiwa, E., Bartels, P., & Makuza, S. M. (2016). Trophy Hunting, Conservation, and Rural Development in Zimbabwe: Issues, Options, and Implications. International Journal of Biodiversity, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8763980

Thomsen, J. M., Lendelvo, S., Coe, K., & Rispel, M. (2022). Community perspectives of empowerment from trophy hunting tourism in Namibia’s Bwabwata National Park. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1874394

Ullah, I., & Kim, D. Y. (2020). A Model of Collaborative Governance for Community-based Trophy-Hunting Programs in Developing Countries. In Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (Vol. 18, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2020.06.004

van Houdt, S., Brown, R. P., Wanger, T. C., Twine, W., Fynn, R., Uiseb, K., Cooney, R., & Traill, L. W. (2021). Divergent views on trophy hunting in Africa, and what this may mean for research and policy. In Conservation Letters (Vol. 14, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12840